The silent way
Introduction
Although people
did learn languages through the Audio-lingual method, and indeed it is still
being widely practiced today, the idea that learning a language means forming a
set of habit was seriously challenged in the early 1960s. Cognitive
psychologists and transformational-generative linguists argue that language
learning does not take place through mimicry: since people can craete utterances they have never heard before, they
therefore cannot learn a language simply by repeating what they hear spoken
around them. These psychologists and linguists argue that speakersfrom rules,
which allow them to understand and create novel uttrences. Thus, language must
not be considered a product of habit formation, but rather of rule formation.
Accordingly, language acquisition, must be a procedure whereby people use their own thinking processes, or
cognition , to discover the rules of the languange they are acquiring.
The
emphasis on human cognition led to the name “cognitive code” being applied to a
new general approach to language teaching. Rather than simply being responsive
to stimuli in the environment, learners are seen to be much more actively responsible for their own learning, engaged in
in formulating hypothesesinorder to discover the rules of the target language.
Their errors are inevatable and are signs to the teacher that the students are
actively testing their hypotheses. Student progress is accomplished little by
little, with a lot of imperfection expected in the beginning. All four skill
(reading, writing, speaking, and listening) are worked on from the beginning
and meaning is thought to be at least as important as form.
Although
caleb gattegno’s silent way, which we will considerin this capter,did not
emerge from the cognitive code approach, it shares certain principles with it.
For example, one of the basic principles of the silent way is that “teaching
should be subordinated to learning ” this principles is in keeping with the
active role ascribed to the learner in the cognitive code approach.
In
order to explore the silent way, we will observe the first day of an english
class in brazil. There are twenty-four secondary school students in this class.
The class meets for two hours a day, three days a week.
EXPERIENCE
As
we take our seats, the taecher hasjust finished inroducing the silent way in
Portuguese. The techer walks to the front of room, takes out a metal pointer
and points to a chart hanging above the blackboard. The chart has a black
background and is covered with small rectagular blocks arranged in rows. Each
block is a different color. This is soundcolor chart. Each rectangle represents
one english sound. There is a with horizontal line approximately halfway down
the chart separating the upper rectagles, which represent vowel sounds, from
those below the line, which represent consonant sounds.
Without
saying anything,the teacher points in succession to each of the five blocksof
color above the line. There is silence.
The teacher repeats the pattern, pointing the same five block of color. Again,
no one say anything. the third time the teacher does the pointing, he say /a/ as he touches the
first block. The teacher continues and taps the four other blocks of color with
the pointer. As he does this, several students say /e/, /i/, /o/, /u/ . the
teacher repeats the pattern one again and this time the whole the class say
unision : /a/, /e/, /i/, /o/, /u/ . he begins with these vowels since they are
the one students will already know. (these five sounds are the simple vowels of
Portuguese and every Brazilian schoolchild learns them in this order).
The
teacher points to the square that represent /e/ . he puts his two palms
together, then spereads them apark to indicate that he wants the students to
lengthen this vowel sound. By moving his pointer, He show that there is smooth
gliding of the tongue necessary to change this portuguese /e/ into the english
diphthong /ey/. He works with the students until he is satisfied that their
pronounciation of /ey/ closely approximates the english vowel. He works in the
same way with /iy/, /ow/, and /uw/.
The
teacher hands the pointer to a girl in the front row. She comes to the front of
the room and point to the white block in the top row. The class responds with
/a/. One-by-one, as she points to the nxt three blocks, the class responds
correctly with /ey/, /iy/, /ow/. She has trouble finding the last block of
color and points to a blok in the same row. A few students yell, “NO!” she
tries another block in the same row ; her classmates yell. “NO!” again. Finally
a boy from the front row says, “A
esquerda” (Portuguese for “to the left”). As the girls moves the pointer
one block to the left , the class shouts /uw/. The teacher signals to another
student to the replace the girl and point to the five blocks as the class
responds. Then the teacher brings individuals to the front of the room, each
one tapping out the sequence of the sounds as he say them. The theacher works
with the students through gestures, and sometimes through instructions in
Portuguese, to get them to produce the english vowel sounds as accurately as
posible. He does not say the sounds himself.
Apparently
satisfied that the students can produce the five sounds accurately, the teacher
next points the five blocks in a different order. A few the students hesitate,
but most of the students seem able to connect the colored blocks with the
correct sounds. The teacher varies the sequence several times and the students
respond approriately. The teacher then points to a boy sitting in the second
row. The teacher moves to the chart and points to five the colored blocks. Two
of the blocks are the above the line are the /ey/ and /uw/ they have already
worked on. The three other blocks are below the line and are new to them. Two or
three of the students yell, “Pedro” which
is the boy’s name. The other students help him as he points to the colored
blocks that represent the sounds of his name: /p/, /ey/, /d/, /r/, /uw/. Two or
three other students do the same. In this way, the students have a little
problem with the pronounciation of the /r/, so the teacher works with them
before moving on.
The
teacher next points to a girl and taps out eight colored boxes. In a chorus,
the students say her name , “Carolina”
and practicethe girl’s name as they did pedro’s. With this the students have
learned the colored that represent three other sounds; /k/, /l/,/n/. The
follows a simillar procedure with a third student whose name is Gabriela. The
students know now the location of /g/, and /b/ as well. The teacher has various
students tap uot the sounds for the names of their three classmates.
After
quite a few students have tapped out the three names, the teacher take the
pointer and introduces a new activity. He asks eight student to sit with him
around a big table in the front of the class gathers behind them. The teacher
puts a pile of blue, green, and pink wooden blocks of varying lengths (called
rods) in the middle of the table. He points to one of the blocks, then points
to three sequares of color on the sound-color chart. Some students attempt to
say “rod”. They are able to do this since they have already been introduced to
these sounds/color combinations. The teacher points againto the squares of
color, and this time all of the students say , “Rod.” The teacher then points
to the block of color representing /a/. He points to his mouth and shows the
students that he is raising his jaw and closing his mouth, thus showing the
students how to produce a new english sound by starting with a sound they
already know. The students say something appoximating /
, which is a new sound for them. The
teacher follows this by pointing first to new block of color, then quickly in
sucession to four blocks of color; the student chorus, “A rod” . he turns a
different chart on the wall; this one has words on it in different colors. He
points to the words “a” and “rod” and
the students see that each letter is in the same color as the sound the letter
signifies. For instance, the “o” of the “rod ” is white since it signifies.
After
pointing to “a” and “rod” the teacher sit down with the students at the table,
saying nothing . everyone is silent for a minute until one girl points to a rod
says, “A rod.” The teacher hands her the pointer and she goes first to the
sound-color chart to tap out the sounds, and second to the word chart to point
to the words “a” and “rod” Several other students follow this pattern.
Next,
the teacher points to a particular rod and taps out “ a blue rod” then he points
to the word chart. A boy points to the rod and says, “ A blue rod.” He goes to
the word chart and finds the three words of this phrase there. Other the
students do the same. The teacher introduces the word “green” similarly, with
students tapping out the pattern after he is through.
The
teacher then points to a pink rod and taps out /pink/ on the chart . the /I/
vowel is a new one for the students. It doesn’t exist in Portuguese. The
teacher points to the block of color which represents /iy/ and he indicates
through his gesture that the students are to shorten the glide and open their
mouths a bit more to say this sound.
The
first student who tries to say “ a pink rod” has trouble with the
pronounciation of “pink.” He look to the teacher and the teacher gesture
towards the other students. One of them says “pink” and the teacher accepts her
pronounciation. The first student tries again and this time the teacher acceptd
what he says. Another student seems to have trouble with the phrase , the
teacher shows her how the phrase is segmented. Then by tapping his second
finger, he indicates that her trouble is with the second word: the teacher then
mouths the vowel sound and with gestures shows the student that the vowel is
shorter than what she is saying. She tries to shape her mouth as he does and
her pronuciation does improve a little, although it still does not appear as
close to the target language sounds as some of the other student are able to
come. With the other student attending, he work with her a bit longer. The
students practice saying and tapping out the three color words and the phrase,
with the teacher listening attentively and occasionally intervening to help
them to correct their pronunciation.
The
teacher has another group of the students take the places of the first eight at
the table. The teacher turns to one of the students and waits. Another student
picks up a green rod and says the same sentence. Through gestures from the
teacher, he understands that he should direct the command to another student.
The second student performs the action and then says, “ take a blue rod,” to a
third student. He takes one. The other studentthen take turns issuing and
complying with commands to take a rod of a certain color.
Next
the teacher puts several blue and green rods in the center of the table. He
points to the blue rod and to one of the students, who responds, “Take a blue
rod.” The teacher then say “and” and points to the green rod. The student says
, “and take a green rod.” The teacher indicates to the student that she should
say the whole sentenceand she says, “take a blue rod and take a green rod.” As
the girl says each word, the teacher points to the one of his fingers. When she
says the second “take,” he gestures that she should remove the “take” from the
sentence. She tries again, “take a blue rod and green rod,” which the teacher accepts. The students now
practice forming and complying with similar compound commands.
The
teacher then points to the word chart to one of the students , who taps out the
sentences on the chart as the other students prodece them. Later, students take
turns tapping out the sentence of their choice on the word chart. Some students
tap out simple commands and some students tap out compoundcommands.
The
students return to their desks. The teacher turns to the class and ask the
class in Portuguese for their reactions to the lesson. One student replies that
he has learned that language learning is not difficult. Another says that he is
finding it difficult; he feels that he needs more practice associating the
sound and colors. A third student adds that she felt as if she were playing a
game. A fourth student says he is felling confused.
At
this point the lesson ends. During the nexy few classes, the student will :
1.Practice with their new sounds and
learn to produce accurate intonation and stress patterns
with the words and sentence.
2.learn moe english words for colors and
where any new sounds are located on the sound-
color chart.
3.learn to use the following items :
Give
it to me/her/him/them.
To
This/that/these/those.
One/ones.
The/a/an.
Put...here/there.
Is/are
His/her/my/your/their/our.
4.practice making sentence with many
different combinations of these items.
5.practice reading the sentences they
have created on the wall charts.
6.work with Fidel Charts, which are
charts summarazing the spelings of all the different
sounds in english.
7.practice writing the sentences they
have created.
THINKING
ABOUT THE EXPERIENCE
Since the silent way may not br familiar
to many of you, let us review in detail our observations and examine its
priciples.
|
Obsevations
|
Principles
|
|
1.
The teacher points to five blocks of
color without saying anything. The blocks of color represent the sounds of
five English vowels close to the five simple vowels of Portuguese.
2.
The teacher points again to the five
blocks of color. When the students say nothing, the teacher points to the
first block of color and say /a/. Several students say /e/,/i/,/o/,/u/, as
the teacher points to the other four blocks.
3.
The teacher does not model the new
sounds, but rather uses gestures to show the students how to modify the
Portuguese sounds.
4.
Students take turns tapping out the
sounds.
5.
One student says “ A esquerda,” to help another .
6.
The teacher works with gestures, and
sometimes instructions in the students native language , to help the student
to produce the target language sounds as accurately as possible.
7.
The students learnvthe sounds of new
blocks of color by tappping out the names of their classmates.
8. The
techer points to a rod and then to three blocks of color on the sound-color
chart. The students respond, “Rod”.
9.
The teacher points to the words “a” and
“rod” on the word chart.
10. The
teacher sits down at the table and is silent. After a minute, a girl point to
a rod and says, “A rod.”
11. The
teacher points to a particular rod and taps out “a blue rod” on the
sound-color chart.
12. One
students tries to say “a pink rod” and has trouble. He look the teacher,but
the teacher remains silent and looks to the the other students.
13. The
first student tries to say “ a pink rod” again, this time the teacher accepts
the student’s correct pronunciation.
14. Another
student has trouble pronoucing part of the phrase “a pink rod” using
gesture,the teacher isolates the trouble spot for her.
15. After
locating the error for the student, the teacher does not suply the correct
language untill all self-correction options have failed.
16. The
teacher mouths the correct sound, but
does not vocalize it.
17. The
student’s pronunciation os improved but still not as close to the target
language sounds as some of the students are able to come. The teacher works
with her a bit longer before the lesson proceeds.
18. The
techer listens attentively.
19. The
teacher says ,“take the green rod” only once.
20. The
students take turn issuing and complying with comands to take a rod
of a certain color.
21. The
students practice compound commands.
22. The
students take turn tapping out the sentences of their choice on the word
charts.
23. Some
students choose to tap out simple commands; other tap out more complex ones.
24. The
teacher asks the students for their reactions to the lesson.
25. There
is no homework assigned.
26. In
subsequent lessons, the students will learn to use number of different
linguistic structures.
27. The
students will practice making sentences with different combinations of these
structures.
28. Students
will practice writing the sentence the create.
|
The
teacher should star with something the students already know and build from
that to the unknow. Language share a number of features, sounds being the
most basic.
Language
learners are intelegent and bring with them the experience of already lerning
a language. The teacher should give only what help is necessary.
Language
is not learned by repeating after a model. Students need to develop their own
“innercriteria” for correctness-to trust and to be responsible for their own
production in the target language.
Students
actions can tell the teacher whether or not they have learned.
Students
should learn to rely on each other and themselves.
The
teacher works with the students whie the students work on the language.
The
teacher makes use of what students already know. The more the teacher does
for the students what they can do for themselves, the less they will do for
themselves.
Learning
involves transferring what one knows to new contexts.
Reading
is workes on from the beginning but follows from what students have learned
to say.
Silence
is a tool. It helps to foster autonomy, or the exercise of initiative. It
also removes the teacher from the center of attention so he can listen to and
work with students.
Meaning
is made clear by focusing students perceptions, not though tranlation.
Students
canlearn from one another. The teacher’s
silence encourages group cooperation.
If
the teacher praises (or criticizes) students, they will be less selfreliant.
The teacher’s actions can interfere with students develoving their own
criteria.
Errors
are important and necessary to learning. They show the teacher were things
are unclear.
If
student are simply given answer, rather than being allowed to self-correct,
they won’t retain them.
Students
need to learn to listen to themselves.
At
the beginning, the teacher needs to look progress , not perfection. Learning
takes place in time. Students learn at
different rates.
A
teacher’s silence freescthe teacher to closely observe the students behavior.
Students
learn they must give the teacher their attention in order no to miss what he
says. Student attention is a key to learning.
Students
should receive a great deal of meaningful practice without repetition.
The
elements of the language are introduced logically, expanding upon what
students already know.
Students
gain autonomy in the language by exploring it and by making choices.
Language
is for self-expression.
The
teacher can given valuable information from student feedback; for example, he
can learn what to work on next. Students learn how to accept responsibility
for their own learning.
Some
learning takes piece naturally as we sleep. Students will naturally work on
the day’s lesson then.
The
syllabus is composed of linguistic structures.
The
structures of the syllabus are not arranged in a linear fashion, but rather
are constantly being recycled.
The
skills of speaking, reading, and writing reinforce one another.
|
REVIEWING
THE PRINCIPLES
As you can see, the silent way has a
greak many principle. Perhaps we can come to a fuller understanding of them if
we can consider the answers to our ten questions.
1. What
are the goals of teachers who use the silent way ?
Atudents should be able
to use the language for self-expression-to express their thoughts, perceptions,
and feelings. In order to do this, they need to develop independence from the
teacher, to develop their own inner criteria for correctness.
Students become
independent by relying on themselves. The teacher, therefore, should give them
only what they absolutely need to promote their learning.
2. What
is the role of the teacher ? what is the role of the students ?
The teacher is a
technician or engineer. “only the learner can do the learning, “ but the
teacher, relying on what his students already know, can give what help is
necessary, focus the students’ pesceptions, “force the awareness,” and “provide
exercises to insure their facility” with the language.
The
role of the students is to make use of what they know, to free themselves of
any obstacles that would interfere with giving their utmost attention to the learning task, and to
actively engage in exploring the language.
As
Gattegno says, “the teacher works with the student : the students works on the
language.”
3. What
are some characteristics of the teaching
learning process ?
Student
begin their study of the language through its basic building block, its sounds.
These are introduced through a language specific sound-color chart. Relying on
what sounds students already know from their knowledge of their native
language, teachers lead their students to associate the sounds of the target
language with particular color. Later, these same colors are used to help
students learn the spellings that correspond to the sounds (through the
color-coded Fidel Charts) and how to read and pronounce words properly (through
the color-coded word charts).
The
teacher set up situations that focus students attention on the structures of
the language. The situations provide a vehicle for the students to perceive
meaning. The situations sometimes call for the use the rods and sometimes do
not; they typically involve only one structure at a time. With minimal spoken
cues, the students are guided to produce the structure. The teacher works with
them, striving for pronunciation that would be intelligible to a native speaker
of the target language is unclear to students and, hence, where to work.
The
students receive a great deal of practice with a given target language
structure without repetition for its own sake. They gain autonomy in the
language by exploring it and making choices. The teacher asks the students to
describe their reactions to the lesson or what they have learned. This provides
valuable information for the teacher and encourages students to take
responsibility for their own learning. Some further learning takes place while they sleep.
4. What
is the nature of the student-teacher interaction ? what isthe nature of
student-student interaction ?
For
much of the student-teacher interaction, the teacher is silent. He is still
very active, however-setting up situations to “force awareness,” listening
attentively to students’ speech, and silently working with them on their
production. When the teacher does speak , it is give clues, not to model the
language.
Student-student
verbal interaction is desirable (students
can learn from one another) and is therefore encouraged. The teacher’s silence
is one way to do this.
5. Hoe
are feelings of the students dealt with ?
The
teacher constantly observe the students. When their feelings interfere, the
teacher tries to find ways for the students to overcome them. Also,through
feedback sessions at hte end of lessons, student have an opportunity to express
how they feel. The teacher takes what they say into consideration and works
with the students to help them overcome negative feelings which might otherwise
interfere with their learning. Finally, because the students are encouraged
throughout each lesson to cooperate with one another, it is hoped that a
relaxed, enjoyable learning environment will be created.
6. How
is language viewed ? how is culture viewed ?
Languages
of the world share a number of features. However. Each language also has its
own unique reality, or spirit, since it is the expression of a particular group
of people. Their culture, as reflected in their own unique world view, is
inseparable from their language.
7. What
areas of language are emphasized ? what language skills are emphasized ?
Since
the sounds are basic toany language, pronunciation is worked on from the
beginning. It is important the students acquire the melody of the language.
There is also a focus on the structures of the language, although explicit grammar rules may never be
supplied. Vocabulary is somewhat restricted at first.
There
is no fixed, linear, structural syllabus. Instead, the teacher starts with what
the student know and builds from one structure to the next. As the learners’
repertoire is expanded, previously introduced structures are continually being
recycled. The syllabus develops
according to learning needs.
All
four skills are worked on from the beginning of the course, although there is a
sequence in that students learn to read and write what they have already
produced orally. The skills reinforce what students are learning.
8. What
is the role of the students’ native language ?
Meaning
is made clear by focusing the students’
perceptions, not by tranlation. The students’s native language can , however,
be used to give instructions when necessary, to help a student improve his or
her pronunciation, for instance. The native language is also used (at least at
beginning levels of proficiency) during the feedback sessions.
More
important, knowledge students already possess of their native language can be
exploited by the teacher of the target language. For example, the teacher knows
that many of the sounds in the students’ native language will be similar, if
not identical, to sounds in the target language; he assumes, then , that he can
build upon this existing knowlege to introduce the new sounds in the target
language.
9. How
is evaluation accomplished ?
Although
the teacher may never give a formal test, he assesses student learning all the
time. Since “teaching is subordinated to learning,”the teacher must be
responsive to immediate learning needs. The teacher’s silence frees him to
attend to his students and to be aware of these needs. The needs will be
apparent to a teacher who is observant of his students’ behavior. One criterion
of whether or not students have learned is their ability to transfer what they
have been studying to new contexts.
The
teacher does not praise or criticize student behavior since this would
interfere with the students’ developing their own inner criteria. He expects
students to learn at different rates. The teacher looks for steady progress,
not perfection.
10. How
does the teacher respond to student errors ?
Student
errors are seen as a natural, indispensable part of the learning process.
Errors are inevitable since the students are encouraged to explore the
language. The teacher uses student errors as a basic for the deciding where
further work is necessary.
The
teacher works with the students in getting them to self-correct. Students are
not thought to learn much if the teacher merely supplies the correct language.
Students need to learn to listen to themselves and to compare their own
production with their developing inner criteria. If the students are unable to
self-correct and peers cannot help, then the teacher would supply the correct
language, but only as a last resort.
REVIEWING
THE TECHNIQUES AND THE MATERIALS
Many of ideas in this chapter may be new
to you. Some of these idea may be immediately attractive to you, whereas others
may not. Give yourself time to think about all of them before you decide their
value to you.
In
the review that follows, the materials surveyed in this chapter (the charts and
rods)
Have been included. While you may not
have access to the actual materials discussed here, the materials may reflect
ideas you can use.
Sounds –Color Chart
The chart contains blocks of color,each
one representing a sound in the target language.the teacher , and later the
students, points to blocks of color on the chart to form syllables, words, and
even sentence. Although we didn’t see it in this lesson, sometimes the teacher
will tap a particular block of color very hard when forming a word. In this way
the teacher can introduce the stress pattern for the word. The chart allows
students to produce sound combinations in the target language without doing so
through repetition. The chart draws the students attention and allows them to
concentrate on the language, not on the teacher. When a particular sound of the
two they are producing, the sound color chart can be used to give them feedback
on which sound they are making.
Finally,
since the sound-color chart presents all of the sounds of the target language
at once, students know what they have learned and what they yet need to learn.
This relates to the issue of learner autonomy.
Teacher’s
Silence
The teacher gives just as much help as in
necessary and then is silent. Or the teacher sets up a situation, puts a
language structure into circulation (for example, “Take a ----rod”)and then is
silent. Even in error correction, the teacher will only supply a verbal answer
as a last resort.
Peer
Correction
Students are encouraged to help another
student when he or she is experiencing difficulty. It is important that
anynhelp be offered in a cooperative manner, not a competitive manner, not a
competitive one. The teacher monitors the aid so that it is helpful, not
interfering.
Rods
Rods can be used to provide visible
actions or situations for any language structure, to introduce it, or to enable
students to practice using it. The rods trigger meaning; situations with the
rods can be created in such a way that the meaning is made clear; then the
language is conected to the meaning. At the beginning level, the rods can be
used to teach colors and numbers. Later on they can be used for more
complicated structures; for example, statements with perpositions (“the blue rod
is between the green one and the yellow one”) and conditionals (“if you give me
a blue rod , the I’ll give you two green ones”). They can be use abstractly as
well; for instance, for the students to make a clock when learning to tell time
in the target language, or to make a floor plan of their house, which they
later describe to their classmates.
The
rods are therefore very versatile. They can be used as rods or more abstractly
to represent other realities. They allow students to be creative and immaginative
, and they allow for action to accompany language.
Self-correction
Gesture
We already examined some self-correction
techniques in the chapter on the Direct Method. Some of the particular gestures
of the silentway could be added to this list. For example, in the class
observed, the teacher put his palms together and then moved them outwards to
signal to students the need to lengthen the particular vowel they were working
on. In another instance, the teacher indicated that each of his fingers represented
a word in a sentence and used used this to located the trouble spot for the
student.
Word
Chart
The teacher, and later the students,
points to words on the wall charts in a sequence so that they can read aloud
the sentences they have spoken.
The way the letters are colored (the
colors from the sound-color chart are used) helps the students with their
pronunciation. There are twelve english charts containing about 500 words. The
charts contain the functional vocabulary of english. Although we didn’t see
them in this lesson, students also work with silent way wall pictures and books
to further expand their vocabularies and facility with the language.
Fidel
charts
The teacher, and later the students,
points to the color-coded Fidel charts in other that students associate the
sounds of the language with their spelling . for example, listed together and
colored the same as the color block for
for the sound are “ey,” “ca, “eigh.” Showingthat these are all ways of
spelling the /ey/ sound in english. Because of the larger number of ways sounds in english can be spelled,
these are eight Fidel Charts in all.
Structure
feedback
Students are invited to make observations the day’s lesson and
what they have learned. The teacher accepts the students” comments in a nondefensive
manner, hearing things that will help give him direction for where he should
work when the class meets again.
The students learn to take responsibility
for their own learning by becoming aware of and controlling how they use
certain learning strategies in class. The length and frequency of feedback
sessions vary dependingmon the teacher and the class.
conclusion
in this chapter we saw
beginning lesson, the silent way is used with advanced student, too. For these
students the same principles apply , and the same charts are used. In addition,
these are pictures for topical vocabularies, books for american cultural
setting , and an introduction to literature.
We have avoided
referring to the silent way as a methodd since caleb gattegno says it is not
one. Proponents of the silent way claim its principles are far-reaching,
affecting not only education, bur the way one perceives the living of life
itself. Nevertheless, there claerly are implications for language teaching and
you should ask youself ahether there are implications for you.
Do
you believe teaching should be subordinate to learning ?does it make sense to
you that learners should be encouraged to be indipendent of the teacher and
autonomous in making their own choices ? do you think students can learn from
one another ? should a teacher look for progress, not perception ? are there
any other principles of the silent way you believe in ? which ones ?
Are
there silent way materials which would be of use to you ? should a teacher
remain silent as much as possible? Is structured feedback a useful thing for
teacher to elicit from their students ? which techniques can you adapt to your
own approach to language teaching ?